论文部分内容阅读
明代皇帝及其朝廷,对经筵日讲官的选用制定了明确而严格的标准和各种具体的条件:规定了讲官必须出自翰林的资格,科举出身、出道深浅的资历,人品端方、正直和孝友的德行,老成持重、注重仪表的修养,才能卓异、学问广博的才学,思想深邃、眼光独到的识见,身材伟岸、白晳清秀、美髯长须的外貌,洪亮清脆、口音纯正的声音,丰富的教学阅历和经验等,特别是在考虑讲官人选时,常常重视综合素质和条件,使讲官的选用成为明朝的重大议题。不过,明廷在选用讲官时,也并不总是求全责备,有时候会在众多相互歧异和冲突的条件中,进行抉择,寻绎最重要的条件。然而,明廷在选择讲官时,也有走眼和失误的地方,如选择的讲官德行有亏,或学术浅薄,或乡音太重,或身体欠佳不能胜任教学重任等等。虽然明代皇帝强调选人以德和任人唯贤,但从其对讲官的选用实践上,可以发现他们任人以色的倾向,以即颜值决定讲官的人选,反映了伦理教条下掩藏的人性之光。
The Emperor and his court of Ming dynasty established clear and strict standards and various specific conditions for the selection of government officials during the feast days. They stipulated that the official must have the qualifications of Hanlin, the imperial examination origins, the debut qualifications, the moral character and the character , Integrity and filial piety of virtue, age-old, focus on the instrument’s cultivation, to excellence, knowledge of broad talent, deep thinking, insightful vision, stature, white and delicate, the appearance of the United States long beard, crisp, pure voice accent , Rich experience in teaching and experience, etc., especially when considering government officials, they often attach importance to the overall quality and conditions so that the selection of speaking officials becomes a major issue for the Ming Dynasty. However, since the Ming court did not always seek full reproach when it chose the speaking officer, it sometimes undertook a choice between the most diverse and conflicting conditions and found the most important condition. However, when choosing to talk about government officials, the court also overlooked and mistaken places, such as the choice of speaking virtuous virtues have deficit, or academic shallow, or accent, or poor health can not be qualified for teaching and so on. Although the emperors of the Ming dynasty emphasized the choice of virtue and meritocracy, in practice, the selection of their interlocutors can be found in their tendency to choose the right one, that is to say, to determine who should be elected, and to reflect the human nature hidden under ethical dogma Light.