论文部分内容阅读
征收物业税的呼声越来越高。从根本上来说,国家推出物业税是为了完善税制。根据国家对物业税改革的框架,物业税是将现行房屋销售过程相关税费进行整合,重新确定税基和税率,在不动产保有环节征收。但在客观上,物业税对房地产市场有一定的调控作用。根据其他国家和地区的经验,拥有第一套住房的税率较低,但随着房屋数量的增加,税率逐步上升。物业税通过加大房屋持有成本降低购房者的热情,遏制炒房者,促进房屋流转速度。从这个角度看,物业税将起到一定的调节房价的作用。现在的问题在于物业税怎么收。对于普通购房者而言,担心的是,物业税改革效仿燃油税,原有税费合并不彻底。结果:新税开征了,旧费接着收,增加消费者的负担。果真如此,物业税非但成不了蜗居者的救命稻草,反而在他们身上又压上了一根致命的稻草。
The call for property tax is getting louder and louder Fundamentally speaking, the state introduced property tax is to improve the tax system. According to the state property tax reform framework, property tax is to integrate the current taxes and fees related to the sale of housing, to re-determine the tax base and tax rates, levied in the real estate ownership link. However, objectively, property tax has a certain regulatory effect on the real estate market. According to the experiences of other countries and regions, the tax rate of owning the first housing is lower, but as the number of houses increases, the tax rate gradually increases. Property tax by reducing the cost of holding the house to reduce the enthusiasm of home buyers to curb real estate speculators and promote the transfer of housing. From this perspective, the property tax will play a role in regulating prices. The question now is how to close the property tax. For ordinary homebuyers, the concern is that the property tax reform follows the fuel tax, the merger of the original taxes and fees is not complete. Result: The new tax is levied, the old fee is then charged, increasing the burden on consumers. If so, the property tax not only failed to make life-saving straw for the dwelling, but instead put a fatal straw on them.