论文部分内容阅读
围绕性被害为研究重点,我们建议从法律和公民社会二个层面建立广泛的司法机制来拓展被害人司法的含义,并制定健全的评价与对比方法。被害与司法模式包括以下三个要素:司法机制,被害情境以及被害人司法需求。司法领域需要新的方式对司法回应进行阐述和对比。我们应以传统和创新司法机制的概念取代报应和恢复性司法,并在赔偿、补偿、恢复等关键术语上达成共识。此外,应将性被害问题置于更广阔的情境或参照域中,通过关注性被害的不同情境,可以建立更系统、可靠的被害与司法实证基础。最后,在司法领域需要比“满意”或“治疗效果”等更清晰的标准来衡量被害人的司法体验。引入被害人司法需求(或利益)的概念可为评估和对比传统与创新司法机制以及理解被害人的司法预期提供新的前景与视角。
Focusing on sexual assault, we propose to establish a wide range of judicial mechanisms from both the legal and civil levels to broaden the meaning of victim justice and to develop a sound evaluation and comparison method. Victimization and judicial model include the following three elements: the judicial mechanism, the victim context and the victim’s judicial needs. There is a need for new ways of judicial elucidation and contrast in the area of justice. We should replace retribution and restorative justice with the concepts of traditional and innovative justice mechanisms and reach consensus on key terms such as compensation, redress and recovery. In addition, the problem of sexual assault should be placed in a broader context or reference field, and more systematic and credible evidence of victimization and judicial substantiation can be established through different scenarios of concern for the victims. Finally, there is a need in the judiciary to measure the victim’s judicial experience with clearer standards such as “satisfaction” or “treatment effect.” The introduction of the concept of the justice needs (or benefits) of the victim may provide new perspectives and perspectives for evaluating and comparing traditional and innovative judicial mechanisms and understanding the judicial expectations of victims.