中国高等院校是人才济济的地方,曾被认为是改革先锋之举的定量考核,首先就出现在这里。科学、规范、公平、公正……被溢满了美誉之词。人们在为自己的工作优劣无法找出恰当办法之时,定量考核的出现无疑使人们大开眼界,深受鼓舞。然而这种至今仍被有些人津津称道的办法,却在第十届全国人大会上受到了越来越激烈的批评。全国人大教育科学文化卫生委员会委员陆善镇尖锐地说,假如陈景润被量化考核,他很可能无法在解析数论方面获得具有世界先进水平的科研成果,把200多年来人们未曾解决的哥德巴赫猜想的证明大大推进一步。陈景润在十年内没有发表过一篇论文,而且其最重要的论文也是发表在国内学术刊物《中国科学》的英文版上。目前,很多高校都实行以各种量化指标为基础的考核评价体系。这种考核与每一个人的利益 Chinese institutions of higher learning are places of great talent, which was once considered the quantitative examination of the vanguard of reform. It first appeared here. Science, norms, fairness, fairness ... are overflowing with the reputation of the word. When people are unable to find out the proper way for their own work, the quantitative assessment will undoubtedly make people have an eye-opener and are greatly encouraged. However, this method, which is still praised by some people till now, has been increasingly fiercely criticized at the Tenth National People's Congress. Lu Shanzhen, a member of the Education, Culture, Science and Culture Committee of the NPC, said sharply that if Chen Jingrun is to be quantified, he probably will not be able to obtain world-class scientific achievements in analytic number theory. He will prove that the unsolved problems of Goldbach's conjecture in more than 200 years Great step forward. Chen Jingrun did not publish a dissertation in ten years, and his most important thesis was published in the English edition of the domestic academic journal “China Science.” At present, many colleges and universities have implemented a system of assessment based on various quantitative indicators. This assessment and everyone's interests