论文部分内容阅读
1、前言 具体地记载处于清朝统治下的蒙古社会状况的史料格外缺乏,此事还与蒙古史料的变迁和收存状况有关。构成清朝统治时期以前的蒙古语史料的核心,是所谓“编年史”类史料,可是这种史料的记事传统终结于18世纪的前半叶。继而出现的是“系谱”类史料,不过即使掌握了王公的谱图,也不会了解此外的其他情况。再有《高僧传》一书,对于西藏和蒙古佛教史的研究无疑是重要的史料,然而对于这些史料的利用则总局限于特定的范围。《大清会典》、《理藩院则例》两部法律史料,是广义的有关行政方面的史料,但是为了更为有效地分析和研究,则需要依靠档案来印证。
1, the preface specifically records the historical material situation of Mongolia in the Qing Dynasty under the rule of the rule of law is extremely scarce, the matter also with the historical changes of Mongolia and the status of the deposit. The core of the Mongolian historical materials that constituted the reign of the Qing Dynasty was the historical chronicle of so-called “chronicles,” but the tradition of the memoir of this historical material ended in the first half of the 18th century. What followed was a “pedigree” type of historical material, but even with the majestic mappings, one would not know otherwise. There is no doubt that the study of the Buddhist history in Tibet and Mongolia is an important historical material. However, the use of these historical materials is limited to a specific area. The two legal historical materials, such as the “General Assembly of the Qing Dynasty” and the “Rites of Justice Courts”, are generalized historical materials concerning administrative aspects. However, in order to analyze and research more effectively, it is necessary to rely on the archives to prove it.