论文部分内容阅读
1992年联合国环境和发展大会表示球的共识,即将环境保护、经济实际贸易纳入综合考虑,但是,目前的组织的实践并未反映这种环保和贸易的国际贸易法和环境法不同的法律制度和两者尖锐的矛盾,前者寻求消除贸易而后者则往往以贸易限制或其他非关措施作为实施手段。因此国际组织不决这些绿色贸易措施引起的冲突。至多自由贸易和环境保护的冲突都在关定和世贸组织的主持下解决。但是,总协定和世贸组织的争端解决机制来用这一机构解决环境保护的问题存在限性。
The consensus reached by the UN Conference on Environment and Development in 1992 that the environmental protection and actual trade in the economy have been integrated into consideration, but the current organizational practice does not reflect this different legal system of environmental trade and trade law and environmental law and The sharp contradictions between the two seek to eliminate trade while the latter tend to use trade restrictions or other non-related measures as their means of implementation. International organizations therefore do not uphold the conflicts arising from these green trade measures. Conflicts at most free trade and environmental protection are settled under the auspices of the authorities and the WTO. However, the GATT and WTO dispute settlement mechanisms use this body to solve the problems of environmental protection.