论文部分内容阅读
本文的目的在于从行政诉讼中不履行法定职责案件中的被诉行政行为分类入手,厘清不履行法定职责行为与行政不作为属于交叉概念,进而通过分析目前履行法定职责案件的审理方式和审理标准,阐明以撤销之诉为导向的审理方式不利于对行政相对人的权利予以充分的救济,也难以体现诉讼的经济性。通过规范分析和理论比较,本文认为针对履行法定职责案件,应构件行政诉讼中的给付之诉,基于原告之诉请、原告与所申请事项之利害关系、未履行职责之内容这三项要件,辅以履行判决,才能实现中立、经济的诉讼方式和服务行政的要求。
The purpose of this paper is to start with the categorization of the sued administrative acts in cases of non-performance of statutory duties in administrative litigation, to clarify that the non-performance of statutory duties and administrative omission belong to the concept of cross. Furthermore, by analyzing the current trial methods and standards, The trial method based on the revocation of the appeal is not conducive to the full relief of the rights of the administrative counterparts, nor is it easy to reflect the economic efficiency of the litigation. Through normative analysis and theoretical comparison, this paper argues that for the fulfillment of statutory duties cases, should be the component of the administrative proceedings in the payment of complaints, based on the plaintiff’s petition, the plaintiff and the matter of interest, the contents of the failure to perform these three elements, Supplemented by the performance of judgments in order to achieve neutrality, economic litigation and service administration requirements.