论文部分内容阅读
马若孟、赵冈等人认为租佃关系并非阻碍中国农业近代化的因素。文章以近代江苏棉种改良工作为例,对此提出质疑。作者认为,佃农因从分租中获益甚少,而不愿种植种子价高且需肥量大的美棉;包租使佃农单独承担田间风险,他们只好因循守旧、继续种植更适宜间作、复种的中棉,以降低收益风险;缴租时限迫使佃农选择种植成熟期短的中棉;由于从正产物中所获甚少,佃农只好种植可以提供更多副产物和副产品的中棉,简言之,租佃关系极大地制约了该地区棉种改良工作的顺利进行。因而,马、赵等人的观点颇值得商榷。
Ma Ruomeng, Zhao Gang and others think that the tenancy relationship is not a hindrance to China’s agricultural modernization. This article takes the modern Jiangsu cotton improvement work as an example, and puts forward the question. The author believes that tenant farmers are not willing to plant American cotton with high seed prices and large quantity of fertilizer because they have little profit from sub-leasing. When tenancy farmers take on the risks of the field alone, they have to continue to grow more suitable intercropping and multiple cropping CIMC to reduce the risk of yielding; the time lag forced tenants to choose to grow short-matured cotton; and because little was gained from the positive product, the tenant had to grow cotton that provided more by-products and by-products The tenancy relationship has greatly restricted the smooth progress of cotton seed improvement in this area. Therefore, Ma, Zhao and others are quite debatable.