论文部分内容阅读
目次一、导言二、与死刑相关的法律三、通过立法缩小死刑的范围四、司法部门的“少而又少”原则五、实践中的“少而又少”原则六、死刑范围扩大(一)印度的ICCPR和死刑(二)强制死刑七、延迟问题八、对弱者的保护(一)青少年(二)患精神病者和精神发育迟缓者九、审判中的缺陷和公平审判问题(一)伪造的证据和证据操纵(二)酷刑和招供的使用(三)证据鉴定(四)预审判听诉(五)非一致同意的审判(六)歧视和偏见(七)法律代表(八)特别反恐法庭(九)补偿十、未来的新挑战一、导言死刑似乎得到很广泛的支持,一项通过媒体进行的民意测验显示,接受测验的人中有75%到80%赞同死刑。在印度,人们并不认为这一问题与人权有很大关系,公众对这一问题的谈论大多集中于对威慑
I. Introduction II. Laws Related to the Death Penalty 3. Reduce the Scope of the Death Penalty by Legislation 4. The Principle of “Less and Less” in the Judiciary 5. The Principle of “Less and Less” in Practice 6. The Death Penalty (1) India’s ICCPR and the death penalty (2) Compulsory death penalty (7) Delay of the issue (8) Protection of the weak (1) Adolescent (2) Persons suffering from mental illness and mental retardation IX. Defects in trial and fair trial (A) the forgery of evidence and evidence manipulation (b) the use of torture and confession (c) the identification of evidence (iv) the pretrial judgment (e) the non-consensual trial (vi) discrimination and prejudice (seven) legal representation Special Anti-Terrorism Tribunal (X) Compensation X. New Challenges for the Future I. Introduction It seems that the death penalty is widely supported. A public opinion poll conducted by the media shows that between 75% and 80% of the people tested agree with the death penalty. In India, people do not think this issue has much to do with human rights. The public’s discussion of this issue mostly focuses on deterrence