论文部分内容阅读
实质性损害、实质性损害的威胁以及阻碍一国国内产业的建立是确定实质性损害的标准,从反倾销实践中来看,实质性损害是最常见的损害类型,损害调查一般都围绕实质损害进行,而很少涉及实质损害威胁,几乎不涉及实质性阻碍,因此,对与为什么将实质性损害威胁确定为确定实质性损害的标准就是一个值得研究和探讨的问题。本文将通过《反倾销协定》、美国法、欧盟法等相关规定并结合相关案例对实质性损害威胁及其存在相关问题进行详细的阐述。
Substantial damage, the threat of substantial damage and the establishment of a domestic industry impeding the establishment of a country’s industry is to determine the standard of substantive damage from the anti-dumping practice, the substantive damage is the most common type of damage, damage investigations are generally carried out around the substantive damage , Seldom deals with the threat of material injury and almost no substantive obstacle. Therefore, it is worth studying and discussing why and why the threat of material injury is defined as the criterion of determining substantive damage. This article will elaborate on the substantive threat of damage and related problems through the “Anti-Dumping Agreement”, the United States law, the EU law and other relevant provisions and related cases.