论文部分内容阅读
一国法院在审理一件涉外民商事案件时,如果冲突规则指向的准据法是某一外国法,就遇到了外国法证明的问题。我国在外国法证明上还没有固定的模式,实践中的适用较为混乱。文章从外国法的内容、外国法的查明方式、对外国法查明的上诉、有关外国法查明的一些特殊规则,以及外国法无法查明时的处理办法这五个角度考察了英国法、美国法和法国法的证明模式,依此为鉴,提出我国法在外国法证明模式上可适用的模式。
When a court of a country considers a civil and commercial case involving foreign affairs, if the law applicable to the conflict rules is a foreign law, it encounters the problem of proof of foreign law. Our country has no fixed model in the foreign law evidence, and its application in practice is rather chaotic. The article examines the English law from the perspectives of the content of foreign law, the way in which foreign law is ascertained, the appeal ascertained in foreign law, some special rules found out in foreign law, and the ways in which foreign law can not be ascertained , The United States law and the French law. Based on this, we put forward the applicable model of our country law in the proof of foreign law.