论文部分内容阅读
人民法院调解民事、经济案件的调解书,是否可以在受送达人下落不阴或采用民事诉讼法第5章规定的送达方式无法送达时公告送达的问题,司法实践中有不同的观点:笔者认为,调解书不宜公告送达,理由是:一、调解书是双方当事人在自愿协商达成一致的基础上制作的,因此它与判决书、传票等强制性、指令性的法律文书不同;民诉法第102条明确规定了调解未达成协议或调解书送达前一方翻悔的,人民法院应进行审判,不应久调不决。这就说明了调解书的生效必须以当事人自愿接受调解书为前提。
Whether the mediation of civil and economic cases by the people’s court can be served on public notice if the farewell party is not delivered or served by the method of delivery provided for in Chapter 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure may differ from judicial practice Opinion: In my opinion, the mediation should not be served on the public notice. The reasons are: First, the mediation is made on the basis of voluntary agreement reached by both parties. Therefore, it is different from mandatory and mandatory legal instruments such as verdict and subpoena. Article 102 of the Civil Procedure Law clearly stipulates that if the mediation fails to reach an agreement or a party regains its replies before the mediation service is served, the people’s court shall try the case and should not be left to adjudication. This shows that the entry into force of the mediation must be based on the parties willing to accept the mediation of the premise.