论文部分内容阅读
本文首先对鉴定结论得以存在的理论基础进行了剖析 ,指出鉴定结论的作用在于补充事实裁判者在专门问题上认识能力的不足 ;鉴定结论是一种证据 ,而非最终结论 ;鉴定结论作为一种独立的证据形式 ,是职权主义诉讼模式的产物。然后对鉴定的提出、鉴定人的选任以及对当事人双方的平等对待等问题进行了分析 ,在介绍了这一问题上的三种不同模式之后 ,指出了我国目前存在的问题及解决方式。之后又对鉴定人的主要权利和义务进行了评析。最后从证据能力和证明力两个方面讨论了鉴定结论的效力。
This paper first analyzes the theoretical basis for the existence of the conclusion of the appraisal, and points out that the function of the appraisal conclusion is to supplement the fact that the adjudicator understands the special problems; the appraisal conclusion is a kind of evidence, not the final conclusion; The form of independent evidence is a product of the mode of litigation. Then, this paper analyzes the problems such as the appraisal, the appointment of appraiser and the equal treatment of both parties. After introducing three different modes on this issue, I point out the current problems and solutions in our country. Afterwards, the appraisers’ main rights and obligations were also evaluated. Finally, the validity of the appraisal conclusion is discussed from two aspects of evidence ability and proof force.