论文部分内容阅读
在我国当前的刑法理论中,正当化行为与犯罪构成处于平行的地位,这使得我们认定犯罪需要经过是否符合犯罪构成和是否存在正当化行为的双重评价,这显然有悖于犯罪构成是认定犯罪的唯一依据的基本原理。但是,如果因此全盘否定和颠覆现有的四要件犯罪构成理论显然并不适宜。所以,我们必须将正当化行为置于我国现有犯罪构成体系之下予以定位。而为避免正当化行为介入现有犯罪构成后的逻辑冲突,则应依据位阶性的原则对我国现行的犯罪构成理论进行重构。
In our country’s current criminal law theory, the justified behavior is parallel to the constitution of the crime, which makes us believe that the crime needs to go through the dual evaluation whether it meets the constitution of the crime and the existence of the justified behavior, which is obviously contrary to the constitution of the crime The only basis for the principle. However, it is obviously not appropriate if the overall negation and subversion of the existing four-component crime constitute a theory. Therefore, we must put the act of justification under the existing constitutional system of crime in our country. In order to avoid the logical conflict after the justified behavior intervenes in the existing criminal structure, the current constitution of crime constitution in our country should be reconstructed in accordance with the principle of the hierarchical nature.