论文部分内容阅读
整理者按:钱穆是20世纪中国学术史上一位重量级人物,海内外研究钱穆的论著可谓汗牛充栋,所凭借的各种史料亦极为丰富,若非新史料的发现或高明者的洞见,要真正推进钱穆研究实非易事。我不曾研究过钱穆,只是在翻阅近代报刊文献过程中,发现一些跟他有关的史料,经查阅既存研究,似无人加以利用。这些史料包括四篇记者介绍钱穆短文和一篇他本人自述,对深入理解钱氏的个性、才情和思想不无裨益。最有学术价值的自然是钱氏早年自述——《苦学的回忆》,1935年4月30日初刊于《大学新闻》,台湾版《钱宾四先生
Sort by: Qian Mu is a heavyweight in the academic history of China in the 20th century. His research on Qian Mu at home and abroad is full of history and all historical materials are extremely rich. If not, the discovery of new historical materials or the insight of wise people should really push forward Qian Mu research is not easy. I have not studied Qian Mu before. I only found some historical materials related to him in the process of reading the modern newspapers and periodicals. After reviewing the existing research, no one seems to make use of it. These historical materials, including the four reporters introducing Qian Mu’s essay and one of his own transcripts, are of no help in understanding Qian’s personality, talent and thoughts. The most academic value of nature is Qian’s early self-report - “memories of hard learning”, published in the beginning of April 30, 1935 in the “University News”, Taiwan version of "Mr. Qian Bin Si