论文部分内容阅读
考试试卷客观分析是评价试卷质量的重要手段。对广西师范大学物理与信息科学学院2004级、2005级本科生的《数字电路》两次考试试卷,计算难度、区分度、效度三个客观评价指标,分析和评价考试试卷的质量,结果表明2004级试卷的难度、区分度、效度分别为0.29、0.44、0.42,2005级试卷的难度、区分度、效度分别为0.39、0.67、0.64,2005级试卷的质量明显高于2004级,更客观、科学地评价教学效果和衡量学生掌握课程知识的程度,考试试卷的难度、区分度、效度分析提供了客观评价试卷质量的有效手段,根据试题的难度、区分度可以在新考试的组卷时科学地决定试题的取舍、修改,进一步提高组卷质量。
Objective examination of examination papers is an important means to evaluate the quality of papers. This paper analyzes three objective evaluation indexes of difficulty, distinction and validity of “digital circuit” examination papers of 2004 and 2005 undergraduates of Physics and Information Science of Guangxi Normal University, and analyzes and evaluates the quality of examination papers. The results show that The difficulty, discrimination and validity of the 2004 papers were 0.29, 0.44, 0.42 and .2005 respectively. The difficulty, discrimination and validity of the papers were 0.39, 0.67, 0.64 and 2005 respectively. The quality of the papers was significantly higher than 2004 Objectively and scientifically evaluate the teaching effect and measure students’ knowledge of the course, the difficulty, distinction and validity of the test papers provide an effective way to objectively evaluate the quality of the test paper. According to the difficulty of the test, Volume scientifically determine the choice of questions, modify, and further improve the quality of the group.