网络服务提供者承担损害赔偿责任,可以从责任构成和免责要件两个角度来探讨。“直接侵权v.间接侵权”的概念区分,与责任构成中的归责要件并不存在相关性,应当取消这样的概念区分。以“损害赔偿”为表现形式的侵权责任,都需要以过错为要件。而免责条款的适用,应当在根据一般要件认定责任成立之后,才进行适用。通过责任构成和免责要件两方面的考察,反思了现有理论和立法的不足,对责任要件作出了一体化的重构。 Network service providers to assume liability for damages, from the responsibility of the constitution and exemption from the two aspects to explore. “Direct infringement v. Indirect infringement ” concept of distinction, and liability components of the blame is not relevant, should be abolished such a concept of distinction. Tort liability in the form of “Damages ” should be based on fault. However, the application of the exemption clause should only be applied after the establishment of the responsibility according to the general requirements. Through the investigation of both the constitution of responsibility and the exemption, the existing theory and legislation are reviewed, and the reconstruction of the elements of responsibility is made.