论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较中药组方和西药治疗小儿营养不良临床疗效。方法:选取118例营养不良小儿患者作为研究对象,采用随机数据表法将所有患儿分为实验组和对照组各59例。对照组患儿采用纯西药治疗,实验组患儿采用中药组方进行治疗,比较两组患儿临床疗效、恢复时间及各生理指标。结果:实验组总有效率高达93.22%,而对照组总有效率仅为79.66%,两组比较具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。实验组患儿恢复时间为(8.1±2.4)d,对照组患儿恢复时间为(13.8±4.2)d,两组比较具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前后比较,两组患儿各个指标均出现升高,对两组进行比较,各个指标在治疗前无统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗后两组患儿各个指标比较有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:采用中药组方治疗小儿营养不良疗效确切,较西药治疗疗效更为显著。
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine in the treatment of pediatric malnutrition. Methods: A total of 118 malnutrition pediatric patients were selected as study subjects. All children were divided into experimental group and control group (n = 59) by random data table method. Children in the control group were treated with pure western medicine. The children in the experimental group were treated with traditional Chinese medicine. The clinical efficacy, recovery time and each physiological index of the two groups were compared. Results: The total effective rate in experimental group was as high as 93.22%, while the total effective rate in control group was only 79.66%. The two groups were statistically significant (P <0.05). The recovery time of the experimental group was (8.1 ± 2.4) d, and the recovery time of the control group was (13.8 ± 4.2) days. There was significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). Before and after treatment, the indexes of both groups were increased, comparing the two groups, each index before treatment was not statistically significant (P> 0.05), after treatment, the two groups of children each index was statistically significant ( P <0.05). Conclusion: The treatment of pediatric malnutrition with traditional Chinese medicine prescription is effective and more effective than Western medicine.