护国运动的领导权究竟属于谁?史学界的解释仍是模糊不清的。迄今为止,主张护国运动的领导权操于以进步党人为主体的立宪派之手的观点,仍为文学界大多数人所接受。这个观点,只注意了立宪派的政治活动,而忽视了资产阶级革命派的政治活动;只注意了滇、黔、桂等省的军事斗争,而未顾及革命派在全国范围的大量军事斗争。其局限性是显而易见的。这就不能不使一些近代史专家对此提出疑义。早在1956年,胡绳武和金冲及就撰文提出:“云南护国运动的真正发动者,是受革命民主主义思想薰陶的新军军官。”然而,“受革命民主主义薰陶的新军军官”权是个概念模糊的军事政治阶层,他们依附于各派政治势力,既无明确的政治 Who is the leader of the National Defense Movement? The explanation of historians is still vague. To date, the view that advocates the leadership of the Hu protectionist movement in the hands of constitutionalists based mainly on the Progressive Party remains acceptable to the majority of the literary world. This view only paid attention to the political activities of the constitutionalists while neglecting the political activities of the bourgeois revolutionaries. It only paid attention to the military struggles in Yunnan, Guizhou and Guangxi provinces and did not take into account the large number of revolutionary battles throughout the country. Its limitations are obvious. This can not fail to make some modern history experts put forward this doubt. As early as 1956, Hu Shengwu and Jin Chongh-hsi put forward the following: “The true promoter of the Yunnan National Humane Campaign is a new army officer subject to revolutionary democratic ideology.” However, “the new army inspired by revolutionary democratization Military officer ”is a vague concept of military and political classes. They attach themselves to the various political forces without clear politics