论文部分内容阅读
司法实践中,围绕侵犯“赃物”的各种行为该如何定性,一直颇有争议。比如,对于吓走窃贼并占有赃物的行为,究竟是不当得利的民事行为,还是抢劫、敲诈、侵占、盗窃等侵犯财产罪的犯罪行为?这必然涉及侵犯财产罪的法益理解、我国刑法对处于非法占有状态的“赃物”是否保护等问题,对此,理论界与实务界分歧很大。日前,本刊结合典型案例,与广东省佛山市顺德区人民检察院联合组织研讨会,特邀专家对上述问题展开讨论。
In judicial practice, it has been quite controversial how to define the various acts of encroaching upon “stolen goods”. For example, for scaring away thieves and possession of stolen goods, whether it is unjust enrichment of civil acts, or robbery, extortion, embezzlement and theft of property crimes such as criminal acts? This inevitably involves the crime of property infringement to understand the legal interests of our criminal law Whether the “stolen goods” is in the state of illegal possession or not is the issue of protection. In this regard, there is great divergence between the theoretical circles and the substantive circles. Recently, this journal combined with typical cases, and Foshan City, Guangdong Province, Shunde District People’s Procuratorate jointly organized a seminar, invited experts to discuss the above issues.