论文部分内容阅读
《人民法治》2015年12月号“法治调查”栏目刊登了本刊记者采写的《合法调解书缘何被再审撤销》的报道后,在各界引起强烈反响。该案当事人双方履行完毕一份民事调解书内容,却因一审法院院长涉嫌违反法定程序启动再审,并将合法取得财产权属的案外人近千万元财产予以反复查封达7年之久,引起上级法院高度重视,指令异地法院执行。但异地法院接手本案后,继续出具裁定,对案外人资产续行查封3年。
“People’s Rule of Law” December 2015 issue of “Rule of Law Survey” published in the section of this reporter’s article, “Why was the legal mediation be revoked because of retrial,” the report, aroused strong repercussions in all walks of life. The parties to the case completed the performance of a civil mediation, but because the first instance court suspected of violating legal procedures to start retrial, and the legal ownership of property of nearly ten million yuan of property to be repeatedly seized for seven years, repeatedly, causing The higher courts attach great importance to directing the implementation of different courts. However, after the court in different places took over the case, it continued to issue a ruling to renew the assets of the outsider for a further three years.