论文部分内容阅读
(一) 中国足球进入职业化以来,裁判问题一年比一年让人气恼,误判错判反判漏判部是很难避免的,但更让人们气恼的是吹黑哨。所谓黑哨,已经伴随着贪赃枉法的问题。多年来一直喊叫“打假”,但却一直没能打住任何一个黑哨。到了1998年,不仅没能使怨声平息,反倒更加高涨起来。我很同意新闻界的普遍说法:中国裁判的职业道德水平比业务水平更低。如今的问题是没有谁能抓到确凿的证据。其实国外的足坛同样也存在行贿受贿问题,也只能在有充分证据的情况下才能治罪。中国足协在这个问题上采取的非理性非法治方法不仅不能起作用,反倒使吹黑哨变得巧妙而肆无忌惮。比如说足协曾经用“莫须有”这个荒唐规则吓唬裁判,但足协也并不真正有胆量凭“莫须有”这个荒唐规则定罪。更
(1) Since the entry of Chinese football into professionalism, the issue of referees has become annoying every year for one year. It is hard to avoid misjudging the sentence of arbitration and adjudication. But what makes people angry is that they whistle more. The so-called black whistle, has been accompanied by the problem of corruption. Over the years has been shouting “crackdown”, but has not been able to beat any of a black whistle. By 1998, not only failed to calm the grievances, but rose even higher. I agree with the press’s general statement that China’s referees have a lower level of professional ethics than their business counterparts. The question now is no one can find conclusive evidence. In fact, foreign football also exists the issue of bribery, and only in the presence of sufficient evidence can be guilty. Chinese Football Association in this issue to take the irrational non-legal approach not only can not work, but instead make the whistle clever and unscrupulous. For example, the Football Association once used the absurd rule of “no need to have” to scare the referee, but the Football Association does not really have the courage to convict on the ridiculous rule of “no need to have.” more