论文部分内容阅读
目的：对无晶体眼并后囊膜缺损的眼行前房型人工晶体植入和缝线固定后房型人工晶体植入术进行临床对比观察，了解临床效果及并发症。方法：随机对两组病人共１６例进行手术。用美国Ｓｔｏｒｚ公司生产双侧“Ｓ”型弹性袢前房型人工晶体和ＫａｂｉＰｈａｒｍａｃｉａ“Ｃ”袢后房型人工晶体。结果：行前房型人工晶体植入术组，术后视力１０以上占３７５％（３／８），０５以上占５０．０％（４／８）。缝线固定术组无一例达１０以上者，０５以上占２５．０％（２／８）。结论：新型前房型人工晶体植入术显示有更多的优越性。从解剖学观点来说，各种缝线固定技术，很难将晶体袢通过缝线定位在睫状沟处，并对眼组织可能造成不同程度的损伤。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effects and complications of anterior chamber intraocular lens implantation and suture fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in patients with aphakia and posterior capsule defect. Methods: A total of 16 patients in both groups underwent surgery. With the United States Storz company to produce bilateral “S” type elastic anterior chamber intraocular lens and KabiPharmacia “C” 袢 posterior chamber intraocular lens. Results: In the group of anterior chamber intraocular lens implantation, postoperative visual acuity was above 10 37 5% (3/8) and over 0 5 accounted for 50.0% (4/8). No suture fixation group of more than 1 0, 0 5 or more accounted for 25.0% (2/8). Conclusion: The new anterior chamber intraocular lens implantation shows more advantages. From the anatomical point of view, a variety of suture fixation techniques, it is difficult to locate the crystal 袢 through the suture in the ciliary sulcus, and the eye tissue may cause varying degrees of damage.