2006年,网络短片“一个馒头引发的血案”挑起了自由职业者胡戈与导演陈凯歌之间的著作权侵权纠纷,也提出了我国著作权刑法保护方面存在的问题。本文试从著作权法的角度对“馒头案”进行分析,并对比《TRIPS协议》及其他发达国家关于“侵犯著作权罪”的规定,指出我国刑法关于“侵犯著作权罪”规定的不足之处及如何进一步完善。 In 2006, the internet short film “A Bread-induced Blood Case” provoked copyright infringement disputes between freelancer Hugo and director Chen Kaige, and also raised some problems in the criminal law protection of copyright in our country. This article attempts to analyze the “Steamed Bread Case” from the perspective of copyright law and contrasts with the “TRIPS Agreement” and other developed countries’ provisions on “crimes of copyright infringement”, and points out the shortcomings of the criminal law on “crimes of copyright infringement” in our criminal law and how further improvement.