论文部分内容阅读
马克思的“分工一阶级”理论是唯物史观的重要组成部分。但是,多年来,一讲到阶级,我们往往习惯于同所有制关系、阶级斗争联系在一起,并且把唯物史观简单地归结为“所有制决定阶级——阶级斗争推动社会发展”这样一种公式,似乎这是唯物史观天经地义的学说,不容置疑。但这种阐释并非马克思本人的理论思路,而是从前苏联一些马克思主义者对马克思理论的解释流传下来的。这种阐释适应了夺取政权和改造所有制
Marx’s theory of “division of labor and one class” is an important part of historical materialism. However, for many years when we talked about class, we are often accustomed to being associated with ownership relations and class struggle, and we simply attribute the historical materialism to a system of “ownership-determined class-class struggle-promoting social development.” Formula, it seems that this is the doctrine of historical materialism, not beyond doubt. However, this interpretation is not Marx’s own theoretical train of thought, but rather from the interpretation of Marxist theory put forward by some Marxists in the former Soviet Union. This interpretation adapted to the seizure of power and transformation of ownership