论文部分内容阅读
加拿大的图书馆学家 L.A.豪泽在图书馆领域的“纯”理论家和其他情报学专家之间的由来已久的争论中采取一种极端立场,认为“根本不存在不同于传统图书馆学的情报科学”,“把 informatics 认为是一个独立的科学领域是没有依据的”。他认为所有独立科学领域都以下列三种因素为表征,即特定的任务、特定的科学共同体和能保证该领域的实验的可复制性因而最终能保证对该领域的成就与进展进行评价的特定科学方法。当然这些并不是成功发展某一科学领域的足够充分条件,但它们都是任何科学领域的存在本身所必需的条件。作者基于上述观点并在假定 JASIS(《美国情报科学学会杂志》)最彻底遵循自己的理论立场的前提下,对 JASIS 十五年来(1970～1984)所发表的文章进行了比较分析。最后他提出了三种从统计学上来证明情报学是一门根本不同于图书馆学
Canadian hunter LA Hauser took an extreme position in the longstanding debate between “pure” theorists in the field of libraries and other informatics experts that “there is no difference between traditional library science Intelligence Science ”,“ There is no basis for considering informatics as an independent science. ” He considers all the independent scientific fields to be characterized by the following three factors, namely, the specific tasks, the particular scientific community, and the particularities that can guarantee the reproducibility of the experiments in the field, so as to ultimately ensure the evaluation of the achievements and progress in the field scientific method. Of course these are not sufficient conditions for the successful development of a scientific field, but they are all necessary conditions for the existence of any scientific field. Based on the above observations, and based on the assumption that JASIS (“Journal of the American Society of Scientific Journals of Intelligence”) most completely follows its own theoretical position, the author makes a comparative analysis of the articles published by JASIS over the past 15 years (1970 to 1984). Finally, he put forward three kinds of statistics to prove that informatics is fundamentally different from the library science