论文部分内容阅读
并入提单的租约仲裁条款的法律效力已在国际上受到普遍的认可。我国的《海商法》对这种仲裁条款仅作了原则性的规定,而尚未涉及与确认这种仲裁条款效力直接相关的一系列法律问题,如:并入提单的租约仲裁条款的措词、形式有效性;对非承租人的提单持有人的约束力;准据法的确定,尤其是能否将主合同适用之法律直接用于规范仲裁条款的问题。本文以理论界就上述问题的争论为基础,对以上法律问题进行探讨,并对我国相关立法提出建议。
The legal validity of the lease arbitration clause incorporated into the bill of lading has been universally recognized internationally. China’s “Maritime Law” provides only the principle of such arbitration clause in principle, but has not yet covered a series of legal issues directly related to the confirmation of the validity of such arbitration clause, such as the wording of the arbitration clause of the lease incorporated into the bill of lading, Formal validity; binding the non-lessee’s bill of lading holder; determining the applicable law, in particular whether the law applicable to the main contract can be used directly to regulate the arbitration clause. Based on the controversy over the above issues in theorists, this article explores the above legal issues and puts forward suggestions on the relevant legislation in our country.