论文部分内容阅读
清代乾嘉学术应当是一个重要的研究课题,而因为种种原因,过去产生了一些偏见和误解,烦琐考证、钻故纸堆等贬损之辞,不一而足。现在对乾嘉学术的认识仍未必深刻和到位,但重视程度和学术成果则明显增强和提高了。像青年学者漆永祥著《乾嘉考据学研究》(中国社会科学出版社1998年12月版)、刘建臻著《清代扬州学派经学研究》(江苏人民出版社2004年12月版)、刘墨著《乾嘉学术十论》(三联书店2006年11月版)等,移用北京大学孙钦善教授《乾嘉考据学研究序》的评语,均“综观探微,颇多创见”。青年学者取得可喜的成绩,是与前辈学者~①的成果支撑和当今较好的学术环境密不可分的。在台湾,乾嘉学术研究绵延不绝,研究论著和文献整理图书,不断推出,林庆彰~②等先生成果丰
In the Qing dynasty, Qianghui and Jia academic should be an important research topic. For a variety of reasons, some prejudices and misunderstandings in the past, cumbersome textual research and the derogatory rhetoric of studying paper piles and other forms of excuse were mixed. At present, the cognition of Qianjia and Jiabao still may not be profound and in place, but the degree of attention and the academic achievements have obviously strengthened and improved. Like the young scholar Qiuxiang Xiang “Qianjia textual research” (China Social Sciences Publishing House in December 1998 edition), Liu Jianzhen “in the Qing Dynasty Yangzhou school studies” (Jiangsu People’s Publishing House 2004 December edition), Liu The book “Qianjia Academic Symposium” (Joint Publishing in November 2006 version), etc., moved to Peking University Professor Sun Qin Shan “Qianjia textual research sequence” of the comments, are “a comprehensive overview of a lot of Transcend.” The gratifying results achieved by young scholars are inseparable from the achievements of previous scholars and the better academic environment of today. In Taiwan, Qian Jia academic research is endless, research works and literature finishing books, has been introduced, Lin Qing Zhang ~ ② other achievements