北方对同一主编所编的两部“百年经典”展开了讨论,南方对“复旦版《中国文学史》现象”议论纷纷。我认为这两件事南北相对,决非偶然。北京大学教授谢冕主编了一套《中国百年文学经典》,在海天出版社出版;接着,他又编了一套《百年中国文学经典》,在北京大学出版社出版。如果两套书是一样的,是重复出版,主编者虽然两边拿稿费并不值得鼓励,但问题也就到此为止了。谁知这两套书 In the north, discussions were held on two “hundred-year-classics” edited by the same chief editor, while many in the south talked about “phenomena” in the history of Chinese literature. I think it is no accident that these two issues are relative to the north and the south. Peking University professor Xie Mian edited a set of “Chinese Centennial Literary Classics” and published it in Haitian Publishing House. Then he compiled a series of “Centennial Chinese Literary Classics”, which was published by Peking University Press. If the two sets of books are the same and repeated, the editor-in-chief will not be encouraged to raise royalties on both sides, but the problem ends. Who knows these two sets of books