白璧德的“人文主义”宗教观包含两个要点:一、“宗教”的概念;二、“人文主义”与宗教的关系。白璧德对于“人文主义”与宗教之关系的判断曾遭到以信教者为代表的西方“传统主义者”的攻击与批驳,并引发了一场“人文主义者”内部的论争:如艾略特认为白璧德的“人文主义”有取代宗教的倾向,强调人文主义依赖于宗教;白璧德则一方面肯定了“人文主义”不能取代“真正的宗教”,另一方面认为它具有“宗教之外的有效性”,从而否认“人文主义”依赖于宗教。由于白璧德会根据不同的语境对自己的判断作相应的调整,因此他的表述经常表现出前后不一致的样态,本论文将结合具体语境对白璧德的宗教观作一阐发,并力求对其中存在着的“矛盾”给出可能的合理解释。 Babbitt’s “humanism” religious view contains two main points: First, the concept of “religion”; Second, “humanism” and religion. Babbitt’s judgment on the relationship between “humanism” and religion has been attacked and criticized by the “traditionalists” represented by the believers and triggered a controversy within the “humanist”: as Ai Rumsfeld specifically considers Babbitt’s “humanism” to have a tendency to replace religion, emphasizing that humanism depends on religion; Babbitt affirms, on the one hand, that “humanism” can not replace “true religion”; on the other hand, Babbitt believes it has “Validity outside religion,” thus denying that “humanism” relies on religion. Because Babbitt will make corresponding adjustments to his judgment according to different contexts, his expression often shows inconsistent patterns. This dissertation will analyze Babbitkin’s religious conceptions in combination with specific contexts. Striving to give a possible reasonable explanation of the “contradictions” existing therein.