论文部分内容阅读
长期以来,在中西哲学比较中存在着一个基本的方法论的错误,这就是将本来属于时间性的文化差异错误地解读为属于地域性的文化差异,并且将中西哲学带入到地域性文化的视野中予以考察,结果造成了中西哲学乃至中西文化在根本上的?格和不可沟通。如果我们对比中西哲学中同属古代世界观范畴的一些普遍的思想范式就可以发现,长期被认为是西方文化传统因素的理性,尤其是理论理性和科学理性,在古代中国也有其最初的表现,同时,它们作为萌芽在古代西方也同样没有得到充分的发展。由此,一种普遍性的文化观察视角就优越于一种地域性的文化比较模式,它使得我们可以对无论是中国的古代和现代还是西方的古代和现代,都取得一种基于历史的批判的视野。
For a long time, there has been a fundamental methodological error in the comparison of Chinese and Western philosophies, which is to interpret the cultural differences that originally belonged to the time as a cultural difference that belongs to the region and bring the philosophy of both China and the West into the perspective of the regional culture In the investigation, the result has caused the Chinese and Western philosophy and even Chinese and Western cultures in a fundamental manner and can not communicate. If we compare some general paradigms of thinking that belong to the categories of ancient world viewpoints in both Chinese and Western philosophy, we can find that the long-term rationalism of Western cultural traditions, especially theoretical rationality and scientific rationality, has also been its first manifestation in ancient China. At the same time, They also have not been fully developed in the ancient West as sprouts. As a result, a universal cultural perspective is superior to a regional model of cultural comparison that allows us to achieve a historical-based critique of both ancient and modern China and the West as well as the ancient and modern West Vision.