论文部分内容阅读
二审作为救济程序和终审程序,其在我国的审判活动中具有重要地位,但是我国目前关于二审程序的立法和实践中的做法尚有不足之处。这直接影响诉讼当事人的权益,特别是作为被告人主张被侵害权益的救济方式,因此二审程序既要顾及实体公正,也需兼顾程序公正与诉讼效率。本文从二审存在的缺陷,主张审判要科学合理,贯彻司法消极、中立、公正的精神,使二审程序能充分保障公民个人的权益,实现立法设置二审程序的目的,维护司法的权威性,促进社会秩序的安定。
The second instance, as the remedy procedure and the final adjudication procedure, plays an important role in the trial activities of our country. However, there are still some shortcomings in the legislation and practice of the second instance trial in our country. This directly affects the rights and interests of litigants, especially as a remedy for defendants advocating the infringement of rights and interests. Therefore, the second instance procedure must take into account the substantive justice and the procedural fairness and litigation efficiency. This article from the second instance flaws, advocated that the trial should be scientific and reasonable, implement the judicial negative, neutral, fair, so that the second instance procedure can fully protect the rights and interests of citizens, to achieve the purpose of legislation to set the second instance of the procedure to safeguard the authority of the judiciary and promote social Order of stability.