论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨腹腔镜输卵管妊娠手术与开腹输卵管妊娠手术的临床效果对比。方法对长葛市人民医院自2008年4月至2012年4月入院并确诊为输卵管妊娠患者78例进行腹腔镜手术治疗(A组),随机选择2008年4月至2012年4月开腹手术治疗(B组)输卵管妊娠手术78例的治疗进行对比分析。结果腹腔镜手术组(A组)与开腹手术组(B组)在手术时间、术中出血量、术后胃肠道恢复时间、下床活动时间、住院时间、住院总费用进行比较差异显著,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜输卵管妊娠手术具有手术时间短、术后恢复快、住院时间短、治疗费用低、创伤小、术后再生育率高等优点。
Objective To investigate the clinical effects of laparoscopic tubal pregnancy surgery and open tubal pregnancy surgery. Methods 78 patients with tubal pregnancy admitted to Changge People’s Hospital from April 2008 to April 2012 were treated with laparoscopy (group A). Patients were randomly selected from April 2008 to April 2012 for laparotomy Treatment (group B) tubal pregnancy surgery in 78 cases were compared and analyzed. Results The laparoscopic surgery group (A group) and open surgery group (B group) had significant differences in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative gastrointestinal recovery time, ambulation time, hospitalization time and hospitalization cost , With statistical significance (P <0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic tubal pregnancy surgery has the advantages of short operation time, quick recovery, short hospital stay, low cost of treatment, small trauma and high post-fertilization rate.