2011年10月,最高人民法院裁定驳回专利复审委具会对上海家化医药科技有限公司兴专利复审委员会等发明专利权无效行政纠粉案(以下简称“家化专利无效纠纷案”)的再审请求。该行政裁定书对于专利无效程序中权利要求的修改规则,具有重要的法律影响。最高人民法院认为:(1)专利权人在专利无效程序对权利要求进行修改,须符合《审查指南》的修改原则,对权利要求书的修改不得超出原说明书和权利要求书记 In October 2011, the Supreme People’s Court ruled that the refusal of the Patent Re-examination Board to invalidate the administrative patent infringement of the invention patents such as the Patent Reexamination Board of Shanghai Jahwa Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “invalid case of domesticated patent”) Retrial request. This administrative ruling has important legal implications for the modification of the claims in the patent invalidation procedure. The Supreme People’s Court held that: (1) The patentee shall comply with the principle of revision of the “Guidelines for Examination” when modifying the claims in the patent invalidation procedure, and the amendment to the claims shall not exceed the original specification and the claims