论文部分内容阅读
罗增儒教授指出:我们对“错例剖析”的基本态度是一贯的,主要有4点:(1)解题错误的产生总有其内在的合理性,解题分析首先要对合理成份作充分的理解;(2)要通过反例或启发等途径暴露矛盾,引发当事者自我反省;(3)要正面指出错误的地方,具体分析错误的性质;(4)作为对错解的对比,补救或纠正,给出正确解法是绝对必要的.文[2]说:解法存疑是解题分析的开始,所谓“解题存疑”就是对自己或他人的解题过程要有鉴别真伪的意识,真正的解题分析就是从这里开始的.在报刊上经常看到“错解分析”的文章,这是笔者最喜欢读的一类解题分
Professor Luo Zengru pointed out: Our basic attitude to “wrong analysis” is consistent. There are four main points: (1) there is always inherent rationality in solving problems, (2) exposing contradictions through counterexamples or enlightenment, triggering self-examination by the parties involved; (3) positively identifying the wrong place and specifically analyzing the nature of the error; (4) as a comparison of remedies, remedies or Correct, given the correct solution is absolutely necessary.Wen [2] said: solution doubts is the beginning of the problem-solving analysis, the so-called “problem-solving ” is the process of solving problems for themselves or others have to identify the authenticity of the consciousness , The real problem-solving analysis is from here in the newspapers often see “wrong solution analysis ” article, which is the author favorite reading a class of problem-solving