辩证看待语文教学中的"多"与"少"

来源 :学周刊 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:wangjian_heu
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
课改之前,不少教师认为讲授的知识越多,教学质量也就越高,“多”讲一点比“少”讲一点强。课改之后,不少教师又认为教师讲得越少越好,学生活动得越多,教学质量就越高。究竟是教师讲得多点好,还是学生活动得多点好呢?“多”与“少”并不能从表面上去看,而应辩证地区别对待,教师讲得少、讲得精固然不错,但学生的活动如何开展才是根本。 Before the course reform, many teachers think that the more knowledge they teach, the higher the quality of their teaching, and the more they say, the less they speak. After the curriculum reform, many teachers also think that teachers speak less and better, the more students’ activities, the higher the quality of teaching. Is it better for teachers to say more or better for students? “More ” and “Less ” can not be seen on the surface, but should be treated dialectically and differentiatedly, teachers say less, Fine indeed good, but how to carry out the activities of students is fundamental.
其他文献
物理学是观察实验与科学思维相结合的产物,是一门思维能力很强的学科。培养学生的思维能力可以为学生将来从事科学研究和发明创造打下初步基础。笔者现根据自己在教学中所得
小学数学教学的改革促使每位教师在教学中努力读懂教材、读懂学生.改善教与学的关系.优化课堂教学结构.无论是在教还是学中.都要留给自己.留给学生一定的思考时间和思维空间,打造活