论文部分内容阅读
过分量化的职称评审机制,从根本上违背了学术研究的自身规律,饱受学人的抱怨和质疑。相关专家提出——钱锺书说:“大批学问是荒江野老屋中,二三素心人商量培养之事,朝市之显学必成俗学。”治学的原动力来自兴趣,发于本心的喜欢才可能做出真正的学问,这本是常识,可多年来却越发为学人不可企及之理想。复旦大学新近推出的职称评选机制,倒像是对钱锺书先生这番话暌违久矣的回应。治学耗时既长,损力亦多,且
Excessive title assessment mechanism, fundamentally contrary to the laws of academic research, full of scholars complain and questioned. Relevant experts put forward - Qian Zhongshu said: “A large number of learning is the old house in the Wild River, twenty-three vegetarian heart to discuss the matter of development, the city of the school will learn Chengzheng Xue.” "The driving force of scholarship from the interest, made in the heart Like to be able to make a real knowledge, this is common sense, but over the years has become more and more scholars unattainable ideals. Fudan University recently introduced the title evaluation mechanism, it seems like Mr. Qian Zhong Shu rebukes a long time in response. Time-consuming treatment of both long, loss of power also, and