当我们的思维定势还只适应于寻索中国作家的外国文学素养的时候,意气风发地倡言创立比较文学领域的“中国学派”,是否在兴致勃勃之中透溢了某种浮躁和僭妄?“中国学派”当然要创立,但这并不是在理论上把“影响研究”与“平行研究”简单地拼合起来,更不是赌气似地在“法国学派”与“美国学派”之间硬加上“中国学派”这一塞子。“中国学派”应有自己的理论内容和方法,更应有自己独特的对象;而这对象的主体当然是世界文学体系中的中国文学——它的准确而完整的含义应包括世界文学氛围影响下的中国文学和中国文学之于世界文学的价值、地位这 When our mindset is only adapted to the search for foreign literary accomplishments of Chinese writers, does the “Chinese school,” which advocates the creation of comparative literature spiritedly, permeate some impetuousness and delirium in the prosperous future? Chinese school “is of course to be founded. However, this does not simply put” influence research “and” parallel research “together in a theoretical way, nor does it mean to add a hard line between” French School “and” American School “ Chinese school ”this plug. The “Chinese school” should have its own theoretical content and method, and should have its own unique object. The subject of this Chinese course is certainly the Chinese literature in the world literature system. Its accurate and complete meaning should include the influences of the world literature atmosphere Under the Chinese literature and Chinese literature in the world literature value, status of this