论文部分内容阅读
法律理论对法律实践的作用问题确切是指,规范性的道德理论在法律实践中是否具有内在的构成意义。围绕此一问题,在《身披法袍的正义》这本书里,德沃金在澄清法律之教义性概念的性质的基础上,分别通过对实用主义的哲学版本和法律版本的检讨,对法律实践中的道德理论进行了捍卫。具体来说,一方面,实用主义的哲学版本诉诸于形而上学论据,其所处的外在怀疑论立场实际误解了道德客观性的性质;另一方面,实用主义的法律版本所推荐的结果导向的试验性方法则完全是一种空洞的论据。德沃金对实用主义的深入批判把我们引向了他所力荐的理论内置型方法,这一方法表达了法律实践对道德理想的内在允诺以及对犬儒主义的坚决抵制。
The role of legal theory in legal practice The problem is precisely whether normative moral theory has an inherent constitutional meaning in legal practice. Around this issue, on the basis of clarifying the nature of the doctrinal concepts of law, in his book The Justice in Robe, Dworkin, through a review of the philosophical and legal versions of pragmatism, The moral theory in legal practice has been defended. Specifically, on the one hand, the philosophical version of pragmatism appeals to metaphysical arguments, the external skeptical position in which it actually misunderstood the nature of moral objectivity; and on the other hand, the results recommended by the pragmatic legal version are oriented The experimental method is entirely a hollow argument. Dworkin’s in-depth critique of pragmatism leads us to the theoretically built-in approach he suggests, a method that expresses the inherent promise of moral practice by law practice and its strong resistance to cynicism.