论文部分内容阅读
读了《化学通报》1974年第2和第5期刊载关于热力学第二定律的三篇文章,很受启发,感到这确是值得讨论的问题。这里,试谈我们对于《热力学第二定律从物理说法导出数学说法》一文(以下简称《说法》)的看法,来共同讨论。《说法》一文向我们介绍了“公理式热力学”在热力学第二定律方面的主要内容,并认为这一“导出”工作“推进宏观的热力学第二定律到完善阶段”。其实,这种“导出”工作只是用逻辑推理的方法,把“物理说法”的物理内容抽去,使剩下“几何学中公理的形式”,即“数学说法”。这是“公理式热力学”的要求。该文那样说,实际上就是说,“公理式热力学”是宏观的热力学的完善阶段。这种观点我们认为有认真讨论的必要。
After reading The Chemical Bulletin, Volumes 2 and 5 of 1974, published three articles on the second law of thermodynamics, I was very inspired to find that it really deserved to be discussed. Here, let us discuss the idea of “the second law of thermodynamics derives from the mathematical explanation of the theory of physics” (hereinafter referred to as “argument”). This article introduces us to the main content of the second law of thermodynamics in the field of “axiomatic thermodynamics” and considers that this “exporting” project “advances the second law of macroscopic thermodynamics to a perfect stage.” In fact, this kind of “exporting” only uses the logical reasoning method to extract the physical content of “physical reasoning,” leaving the “form of axiom in geometry” or “mathematical theory.” This is the “axiomatic thermodynamics” requirement. The article said that, in fact, “axiomatic thermodynamics” is a macro thermodynamic improvement stage. We think this view is necessary for serious discussion.