论文部分内容阅读
近十多年来精神疾病与利手关系的研究表明,多种精神疾病的患者有利手型式变异的趋势,揭示存在脑功能优势改变的事实。但各家研究所报告的结果却不尽一致,普遍认为研究总体的年龄、性别、文化程度以及所处社会文化的习俗均可造成研究结果的差异,但关键还在于进行研究时所采用的利手评定项目,利手资料的处理与分类等方法学上的差异,以致难于进行相互比较。本文拟就利手评定所采用的项目方面进行探讨,试图筛选出较为有效的评定项目。
In the past ten years, the study on the relationship between mental illness and beneficial hand shows that patients with various mental diseases have the tendency of hand type variation, revealing the fact that there is a change in the predominance of brain function. However, the results reported by various institutes are not consistent. It is generally accepted that the study’s overall age, gender, educational level, and social and cultural customs may all contribute to the differences in research results, but the key lies in the fact that the research Hand assessment of the project, the processing and classification of beneficial data and other methodological differences, making it difficult to compare with each other. This article intends to use the hand to assess the aspects of the project to explore, trying to filter out a more effective assessment of the project.