论文部分内容阅读
为比较依托咪酯与异丙酚静脉快速诱导围插管期心血管反应 ,将 2 0例患者随机分成 A、B两组 ,A组 10例 ,麻醉诱导使用异丙酚 2 mg/kg、芬太尼 4ug/kg;B组 10例 ,麻醉诱导使用依托咪酯 0 .3 mg/kg、芬太尼 4ug/kg,采用美国 CSI110 0监护仪监测血液动力学变化。结果显示 ,A组围插管期血压及脉率下降较麻醉前明显 ,经统计学处理有显著性差异 ,P<0 .0 5 ;B组围插管期血压及脉率与麻醉前比较无明显变化 ,经统计学处理无显著性差异 ,P>0 .0 5。
In order to compare the cardiovascular response induced by intrathecal injection of etomidate and propofol, 20 patients were randomly divided into A and B groups, 10 cases in group A were anesthetized with propofol 2 mg / kg and Fen Taiyou 4ug / kg; B group 10 cases, the induction of anesthesia using etomidate 0.3 mg / kg, fentanyl 4ug / kg, using the United States CSI110 0 monitor to monitor hemodynamic changes. The results showed that during group A, the decrease of blood pressure and pulse rate during peristubal intubation was significantly more than that before anesthesia, and there was a significant difference by statistical analysis (P <0.05). The blood pressure and pulse rate during peri-intubation period in group B were significantly lower than those before anesthesia Significant changes, no significant difference by statistical analysis, P> 0.05.