论文部分内容阅读
论文以国内率先试点探索农田保护经济补偿政策的创新实践地区——成都和苏州为典型实证,基于2012和2015年两期农户动态跟踪调研数据,运用DID模型测量农田保护经济补偿政策实施异质效应及影响因素。结果表明:1)农田保护经济补偿政策的持续实施显著增加实践地区农民的政策满意度,激励农民参与农地流转,但对提升农民参与农田保护性耕作措施的作用较小。2)农田保护经济补偿政策实施成效具有显著异质性。2008年开始试点养老保障与农业补偿相结合的耕地保护基金政策的成都市,农户政策满意度的上升幅度相对较大。乡镇经济发达、长三角地区经济发展带重镇的苏州市,农户家庭生计多元,户均非农业收入占比达82.12%,较成都农户高2.66%,农地生计依赖较弱,补偿政策明显促进该区域农户参与农地流转,但农户农田保护积极性值却大幅下降。3)受访者的年龄、受教育水平、农田保护及功能认知、对农田保护政策关注程度、农业收入占比、家庭劳动力比例、调研村庄经济水平及受访村庄与最近城镇距离均会显著影响农田保护经济补偿政策实施成效。
Based on the survey data of dynamic tracking of rural households in 2012 and 2015, the paper uses the DID model to measure the heterogeneity of economic compensation policies for farmland protection, taking Chengdu as the first example to explore the innovative practice areas of farmland protection economic compensation policies in China. And influencing factors. The results showed that: 1) The continuous implementation of the farmland protection economic compensation policy significantly increased the policy satisfaction of peasants in the practice area and encouraged the peasants to participate in the farmland circulation. However, they did little to improve the farmers’ participation in the conservation tillage. 2) The implementation of the farmland protection economic compensation policy has significant heterogeneity. In Chengdu, pilot policy of arable land protection fund combining old-age security with agricultural compensation started in 2008, the degree of policy satisfaction of farmers increased relatively. In the economically developed towns and cities in the Yangtze River Delta, Suzhou has a rich livelihood, with 82.12% of the average non-agricultural income per household, 2.66% higher than that of Chengdu, less reliance on farmland, and obvious compensation policies Regional farmers participate in the transfer of farmland, but the enthusiasm of farmers in farmland protection has dropped significantly. 3) The respondent’s age, education level, farmland protection and functional cognition, attention to farmland protection policy, proportion of agricultural income, family labor force, surveyed village’s economic level and the distance between the surveyed village and the nearest town Affect the implementation of the farmland protection economic compensation policy.