论文部分内容阅读
著作权客体为无体的表达性智力成果,故作品分类应以表达元素为准,而与载体无关。建筑作品为点、线、面、空间、色彩的组合,此乃美术作品应有之义,而“空间说”却将其特性小题大做。强调“实用性、科学性”者,则入专利法之雷池,因著作权法只关注作品的美感。《著作权法实施条例》以“建筑物和构筑物形式”为建筑作品之要件,有损作品分类原理,增法律适用之不便。建议完善“美术作品”概念的周延性,将“建筑作品”复归“美术作品”之子类,强调“不问载体性质均受保护”。
The object of copyright is the expressive intelligence achievement of the body, so the classification of the works should be based on the expression elements, but not the carrier. Architectural works for the point, line, surface, space, color combinations, this is the art work should have its meaning, and “space said ” but its characteristics a minor fuss. Emphasize “practicality, scientific ” who, into the patent pool of thunder, because the copyright law only concerned about the beauty of the work. The “Regulations for the Implementation of Copyright Law” to “building and structure in the form of” elements of construction work, loss of work classification principle, by the inconvenience of the law. It is suggested that the perfection of the concept of “art work” should be perfected and “subversion” of “architecture work” be returned to “art work”, emphasizing that “the nature of the bearer is protected”.