论文部分内容阅读
斯托雷平及其改革历来是俄罗斯史学界比较关注的课题,苏联解体后,这一研究在俄罗斯学界出现了新一轮热潮,相关著述累计达千余种,各种观点不断涌现,在本世纪初渐趋于成熟。这些研究对斯托雷平所施行的改革总体偏向于肯定态度,如在斯托雷平个人立场、改革的历史作用、改革失败原因和改革思想遗产的评价上都得出了更为积极的结论,并将研究领域拓展到了法律、个人自由、经济现代化、科学和文化教育等方面,有力地推进了对这个问题的研究。为了对这些问题有更为全面的了解,我们对此前学术界如苏联时期和其他国家学者发表的相关看法也有选择地加以介绍,以供研究者对比参考。
Stolypin and its reform have always been the topics of much concern to Russian historians. After the disintegration of the Soviet Union, there was a new round of upsurge in this field in Russian academic circles, with a total of more than 1,000 kinds of related writings. The beginning of the century tends to mature. These studies generally favor Stollopin’s reform in favor of positive attitudes, such as Stollping’s personal position, the historical role of reform, the reasons for the failure of reforms and the evaluation of the legacy of reform have come to a more positive conclusion , And expanded the research field to the aspects of law, personal liberty, economic modernization, science and culture education, and vigorously promoted the research on this issue. In order to have a more comprehensive understanding of these issues, we also selectively introduce the relevant views of academics such as the Soviet Union and other countries for the reference of researchers.