论文部分内容阅读
漢語史上的雙音化問題一直是漢語研究的熱點問題。以往的研究曾從不同的角度對這一現象做出解釋。總結起來,可以歸爲功能觀和韻律觀,前者又可細分爲補償説、功能差異説、修辭美學説、社會發展需求説,後者包括韻律偏好説、彈性説、音步轉型説。本文在綜述以往相關研究得失的基礎上,指出音步轉型説較以往的各種假説能更好地解釋漢語史上的雙音化問題。
The dual syllable problem in Chinese history has always been a hot issue in Chinese studies. Previous studies have interpreted this phenomenon from different perspectives. To summarize, it can be categorized as function view and rhythm view. The former can be subdivided into compensation theory, function difference theory, rhetorical aesthetics theory and social development need theory. The latter includes rhythm preference theory, elasticity theory and sound transformation theory. On the basis of summarizing the gains and losses of related research in the past, this paper points out that the transliteration of tone-steps can better explain the dual-dialect problems in Chinese history than the various hypotheses in the past.