论文部分内容阅读
目的对比传统手术与腹腔镜保留输卵管治疗对宫外孕患者生活质量以及负性情绪的影响。方法选取我院从2013年1月至2015年1月收治的宫外孕患者100例,按照患者术式需要将100例宫外孕患者分为观察组(50例)和对照组(50例);对照组采取传统手术方法输卵管切除术,观察组采取腹腔镜下输卵管开窗取胚术,将两组患者的HAMA评分与HAMD评分、SF-36评分以及术后妊娠率进行对比。结果手术后:观察组的HAMA评分与HAMD评分明显低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组的SF-36评分明显高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组半年妊娠率与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),观察组一年妊娠率明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论与传统手术方式相比,腹腔镜下输卵管切开取胚术减少了患者焦虑抑郁等负性情绪的发生、提高了患者生活质量,并有利于妊娠的恢复。
Objective To compare the effects of traditional surgery and laparoscopic preservation of tubal on quality of life and negative emotions in patients with ectopic pregnancy. Methods One hundred patients with ectopic pregnancy who were treated in our hospital from January 2013 to January 2015 were enrolled in this study. 100 cases of ectopic pregnancy were divided into observation group (50 cases) and control group (50 cases) The traditional surgical method of tubal resection, the observation group to take laparoscopic tubal embryo surgery, the two groups of patients with HAMA score HAMD score, SF-36 score and postoperative pregnancy rate were compared. Results After operation, the HAMA score and HAMD score of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P <0.05). The SF-36 score of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P <0.05) The difference was not statistically significant (P> 0.05). The pregnancy rate in observation group was significantly higher than that in control group (P <0.05). Conclusion Compared with the traditional surgical methods, laparoscopic tubal embryo surgery reduces the occurrence of negative emotions such as anxiety and depression, improves the quality of life of patients and is conducive to the recovery of pregnancy.