“意象素描”——“气韵素描”质疑

来源 :西安美院学报 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:jwh777
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
“意象素描”,这个新的教学法,实际上主张对形体要“一变再变”,但是在理论上却引用了许多我国古代画论的用语,并说:“意象素描,从根本上看是气韵素描”。注①这就容易使人误解似乎素描教学大幅度变形的要求是源於“意、神、气、韵”等古人的明训,果然是这样吗?对此我愿略抒管见。 “The sketch of images”, the new pedagogy, actually advocates “changing and changing” to the body, but in theory it quotes many of the terms used in ancient Chinese painting theory and states: “The sketch of the image is fundamentally Is the charm sketch. ” Note ① It is easy to make people misunderstand it. It seems that the requirement of drastic deformation of sketch teaching is derived from the ancient teaching of “ancestors, gods, qi and rhyme.” Is this really the case?
其他文献