狠批孔孟之道同旧传统观念彻底决裂

来源 :西北工业大学学报 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:afanti76
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
伟大的校育革命和当前的批林批孔运动对我进行了一场深刻的教育。反对“走后门”的革命大字报对我是最好的启发和挽救,使我的思想震动很大,公与私的斗争相当激烈。尤其是南京大学钟志民同志的退学申请报告和《人民日报》的[编者按]发表后,我认真地进行了学习,找到了错误思想的根源。南大钟志民同志的信提出了这样的一个问题,对于革命干部的子女来说是躺在父母的功劳薄上享受“特殊照顾”还是积极献身于三大革命运动锻炼自己,接好老一辈用鲜血和生命换来的无产阶级革命事业的班?是靠父母还是靠自己?我认为只能是后者。钟志民同学说得好:“走后门”的思想基础,是资产阶级私有观念的残余;它的社会基 The great schooling revolution and the current bodhisattva bidding exercise have given me a profound education. The revolutionary poster campaign against the “back door” was the best inspiration and salvage for me. It shocked my thinking and the fight between public and private was fierce. In particular, after Comrade Zhong Zhimin’s application for withdrawal from Nanjing University and the [Editor’s Note] published by the People’s Daily were published, I seriously studied and found the root cause of the wrong thoughts. The letter from Comrade Zhong Zhimin of Nanta raises the question of whether the children of revolutionary cadres should lay emphasis on the merits of their parents to enjoy “special care” or to actively dedicate themselves to the three major revolutionary campaigns to exercise themselves and take good care of the blood of the older generation The class of proletarian revolutionary career brought about by life depends on the parents or on our own. I think it can only be the latter. Zhong Zhimin’s students put it well: the ideological foundation of “going back door” is the remnant of the private concept of the bourgeoisie; its social foundation
其他文献