论文部分内容阅读
一项制度的自我辩护与价值证成必须从其正当性的论证做起。没有义务而干涉他人事务却没有构成侵权行为,法律甚至将其列为阻却违法事由,无因管理制度的正当性基础到底是什么?在意思自治、私法神圣的民法领域,却出现了主动干预他人事务的价值倾向,又该如何理解这两种价值冲突?本文首先对“正当性”进行了法理分析,然后通过追溯无因管理制度的历史渊源,探求其起源的历史正当性,同时又结合近现代关于无因管理制度价值与正当性的相关学说,对无因管理制度的价值证成与正当性进行了相关探讨。
A system of self-defense and value card must start from the justification of their justification. No obligation to interfere in others’ affairs does not constitute infringement, and the law even lists it as a deterrent to illegal activities without any justification on the basis of the management system. In the field of civil law that is autonomy-autocratic and divine-private, there is an active intervention in others How to understand these two kinds of value conflicts? Firstly, this thesis conducts a legal analysis of “legitimacy ”, and then traces the historical legitimacy of its origin by tracing the historical origin of non-cause management system, Combined with the modern theory of the value and legitimacy of non-government management system, this paper discusses the value certification and justification of non-management system.